Page 25 - May 2013 • Southern California Gaming Guide

Bob Dancer: Video Poker
TIhe Secret to Success
was reading inking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman, Nobel Prize winner in Economics. e part of the book that inspired this article was called“Regression to the Mean.” In this chapter, Kahneman recalled something he submitted when he was one of several scientists requested to
tightening the machines, or perhaps the promotions not being so generous. e truth is that machines are generally tighter than they were a year ago and the promotions are less generous, but this doesn’t matter very much. Good situations can still be found. Good players can nd those good situations. e best players are still winning, and the not-so-good players are still making excuses.
e real explanation, however, for those who had their worst year last year, is that they were relatively unlucky compared to what happened in other years.
Let’s look again at professional baseball. I’m from Los Angeles originally, and I like both the Angels and Dodgers to do well. Both should be better-than-average this year and their meeting in the World Series is de nitely possible (albeit not very likely). In that best-of-seven series, luck
will play a major role in who wins.
If I get a bunch of video poker players from the South
Point to form a team and we go up against either the Angels or Dodgers, luck will not have anything to do with it. We’ll get slaughtered — 100 to 0 — and that’s just in the
rst inning.
e same is true in video poker. Among players, highly
skilled or not, there will always be a luck component in the results. But among highly skilled players, the luck will cause the annual results to vary primarily in positive territory. With not-so-highly skilled players, luck will cause the annual results to vary in negative territory.
Improving your skill does help your results on average. Improving your skill will never eliminate the variance in your score. Exactly where your score ends up will always have a luck component in it, but over several years, where your score ends up will have a very large skill component in it as well.
Listen to Bob’s radio show Gambling With An Edge, on Thursday evenings 7 to 8 p.m. Pacific Time on radio station 1230 AM in Las Vegas online at klav1230am.com. Dancer’s products may be ordered at bobdancer.com or at 1-800-244-2224 Monday through Friday from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Pacific Time.
report their “favorite equation.”
Kahneman reported:
Success = Talent + Luck
Great Success = A Little More Talent + A Lot of Luck Talent is something that stays with you. Luck, not so
much. Let’s say a video poker player had the following annual results:
2009: 2010: 2011: 2012:
year, this player got extra lucky. If he’s a baseball player, the balls he hit tended to be barely fair rather than barely foul. His hit balls “had eyes,” and found their way between the defenders. On the day he faced the league’s best pitcher, that pitcher was having an o day. He didn’t get injured and didn’t face stressful situations o the eld. Good luck is not something you can count on over time. It’s very unlikely that this kind of luck will happen next year as well.
Back when my Million Dollar Video Poker autobiography rst came out where I wrote that I won $1,000,000 over six months, one of my professional player friends commented that all the book showed was that I got lucky over that half-year. I was o ended by his assessment, but now I think there was a lot of truth to what he was saying. Yes, I had some talent to recognize and capitalize on some situations, but being in the right place at the right time and being greatly over-royaled for six months accounted for much of my success during that million-dollar run. Although I’ve almost always had positive annual scores (which indicates a certain level of talent) I’ve never again come close to earning a million dollars in one year (which indicates that much of that result was due to luck rather than skill).
e same thing works in reverse. If you had your biggest loss ever last year, this year will probably be better. Just as good luck can’t be counted on, neither can bad luck. Your worst-ever result in any year is probably more due to bad luck than lack of skill. You pick situations carefully and make the correct plays, but sometimes the good hands come, and sometimes they don’t.
You hear players making explanations/excuses as why they had their biggest loss recently — and this explanation usually involves the casinos or game manufacturers
+5,000 +9,000 +7,000 +33,000
What would you predict about what their score will be in 2013, assuming you were making this prediction on January 1, 2013?
It’s clear that this player has some talent. ere is an upward trend where over time the scores for this player are getting better, although 2011 was a little worse than
2010. Most players lose at video poker, and winning the past four years in a row is a better-than-average result. e 2012 score is quite a bit larger than the others. Do you
think that kind of success will probably continue, or do you think the score will revert to the lower level of success? If I had to pick a number, I’d probably pick something in the range of $13,500 as my best guess. at’s the average of the four numbers. I think the breakout year was probably an anomaly, and the score in 2013 will be lower than the maximum. I believe most people would pick a number
quite a bit higher than I would. ey would “spot a trend” and go with it.
You see this in sports all the time. Players have a breakout year — get a huge contract — and then become not-so-spectacular. Sports writers make up all sorts of explanations on “why” this happens, but the simple explanation that makes sense is that during the breakout
Connect with us online
for the latest Southern California Casino and Slot News!
Facebook.com/TheGamingGuide @theGamingGuide
MAY 2013
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAMING GUIDE
PAGE 25